Showing posts with label genealogy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genealogy. Show all posts

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Out of India after Africa? Nat Geo now supports this theory

"Modern humans migrated out of Africa via a southern route through Arabia, rather than a northern route by way of Egypt, according to research announced at a conference at the National Geographic Society this week.

“Evolutionary history shows that human populations likely originated in Africa, and the Genographic Project, the most extensive survey of human population genetic data to date, suggests where they went next…Modern humans migrated out of Africa via a southern route through Arabia, rather than a northern route by way of Egypt,” said a news statement released by IBM."


“The divergence of a common genetic history between populations showed that Eurasian groups were more similar to populations from southern India, than they were to those in Africa. This supports a southern route of migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia before any movement heading north, and suggests a special role for south Asia in the ‘out of Africa’ expansion of modern humans.”

Full Story 

Other links:

Genographic Project confirms humans migrated from Africa through Arabia 

 

Monday, June 28, 2010

Facts and Common Misconceptions

  • No, haplogroups are not the same as haplotypes.
  • Yes, all people living today fall into one of 18 main Y-DNA haplogroups on their paternal line, and one of 26 main mtDNA haplogroups on their maternal line.
  • No, haplogroups will not show if you are related to someone (unless you count distant relationships from thousands of years ago).
  • Yes, once you know your haplogroup, you will be able to view how your haplogroup migrated out of Africa and retrace their migration routes.
  • No, haplogroups will not add people to your family tree or allow you to trace your surname (that’s the job of STR haplotypes).
  • No, haplogroups will not tell you precise migration routes, it will show a broad migration route and population distribution.
  • No, if you and someone else belong to the same haplogroup, it does not mean that you are closely related.
  • Yes, once you know your haplogroup, you can often fine tune your branch of the haplogroup tree through subclade testing.
  • No, you cannot confirm your haplogroup through STR testing or HVR1 testing.  A Y-DNA STR test and HVR1 test will often allow you to predict your haplogroup, but only a SNP backbone test will confirm the prediction.
  • No, SNP backbone testing will not give you information about sub-clades.  It will confirm your haplogroup.  Once your haplogroup has been confirmed, a subclade panel test for your particular haplogroup will trace your subclade. 
  • Yes, STR testing can give predictions for haplogroups and even some sub-clades, but the backbone test can only confirm the haplogroup, not the sub-clade.
  • Yes, subclades are determined through SNP subclade testing (once your haplogroup has been confirmed)
  • No, your haplogroup will not tell you if you are Welsh or Irish.  It will not tell you your ethnicity.  Although there are associations between ethnic groups and haplogroups, you must remember that haplogroups represent deep ancestry, tracing events from tens of thousands of years ago.  It does not tell you what your ancestors have been up to over the last few hundred years (that’s the job of Y-DNA STR markers, and applications such as Surname Projects, which will be the topic of another blog). 
  • Yes, all people living in the world today are connected in the human phylogenetic tree.  Just like how all people belong to a certain blood group i.e. A, B, AB, O which can be determined through testing, all people also belong to a certain haplogroup which is unique to their ancestry, and their haplogroup type can be determined through genetic genealogy testing. 
From Genebase.com

    Thursday, November 5, 2009

    Haplogroup R1a frequency and distribution map (2009)

    This map clearly shows that the expansion time of this haplogroup originating around the Indus Valley.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2009

    Sanskrit and Lithuanian

    One of the most important stimuli for the emergence of historical-comparative linguistics was the acquaintance of Europeans with Sanskrit, the old language of India. Europeans believed that a Sanskrit scholar could understand and be understood by a Lithuanian farmer.

    In 1786, William Jones (1746-1794), an English Justice of the Supreme Court of Judicature in Calcutta, read a paper before the Asiatic Society, founded by himself, in which he proclaimed that Sanskrit, this "wonderfully structured old language of India" is derived from the same source as Greek, Latin, and perhaps even Gothic and Celtic. This was a very bold idea, which produced a veritable revolution in linguistics.

    European scholars turned their attention to Sanskrit, and started with old European languages. They created precise methodology which enabled them to understand phonetic changes and distinguish original words from loans. They taught themselves through the comparison of related words in different languages to reconstruct the extinct forms, which were very often similar or even identical with Sanskrit forms.

    Linguists believed that comparative linguistics without Sanskrit is like astronomy without mathematics.

    It is not difficult therefore to imagine the surprise of the scholarly world when they learned that even in their time somewhere on the Nemunas River lived a people who spoke a language as archaic in many of its forms as Sanskrit itself. Although it was not exactly true that a professor of Sanskrit could talk to Lithuanian farmers in their language, coincidences between these two languages were truly amazing, for example:

    Sanskrit sunus son - Lith. sunus;
    Sanskrit viras man - Lith. vyras;
    Sanskrit avis sheep - Lith. avis;
    Sanskrit dhumas smoke - Lith. dumas;
    Sanskrit padas sole - Lith. padas.

    We can be safe in asserting that these Lithuanian words have not changed their forms for the last five thousand years.

    The most prominent European linguists visited Lithuania in order to learn this archaic language from the lips of Lithuanians themselves, which helped them investigate the history of other Indo-European languages.

    Today, there is no doubt that Lithuanian has retained many ancient Indo-European forms. It is hard to say whether it was due to the character of the Lithuanians or of geographic position that their language has changed so little in the course of several thousand years. Scholars often make references to the Lithuanian language when conducting research on the history of other languages.


    From "Lithuania in the World", 1996 No1.

    Lithuanian words similar or exact to Sanskrit

    • Lithuanian du/dvi, Sanskrit dvi/dve, Greek duo/dwo/tyu, Latin duo ("two")
    • Lithuanian trys, Sanskrit tri/traya, Greek trios/tria/treis, Latin tres ("three")
    • Lithuanian penki(os), Sanskrit páñcan, Greek pente/pende(cis) ("five")
    • Lithuanian šeši(os), Sanskrit sas, Greek heks/hecs/hex, Latin secs/sex ("six")
    • Lithuanian septyni(os), Sanskrit saptahn/sapta, Greek hepta(cis)/septa, Latin septem ("seven")
    • Lithuanian aštuoni(os), Sanskrit ashtan/ashta, Greek akto/okto/oktu(cis), Latin octo ("eight")
    • Lithuanian dešimt(is), Sanskrit dasham, Greek deka/deca(cis), Latin deci/decem ("ten")
    • Lithuanian žiema, Sanskrit hima ("winter")
    • Lithuanian derva/darva, Sanskrit druma/taru ("tree")
    • Lithuanian vilkas, Sanskrit vrika ("wolf")

    • Lith. and Skt. sūnus (son)
    • Lith. and Skt. avis and Lat. ovis (sheep)
    • Lith. dūmas and Skt. dhumas and Lat. fumus (smoke)
    • Lith. antras and Skt. antaras (second, the other)
    • Lith. vilkas and Skt. vrkas and Lat. lupus (wolf)
    • Lith. ratas and Lat. rota (wheel) and Skt. rathah (carriage).
    • Lith. senis and Lat. senex (an old man) and Skt. sanah (old).
    • Lith. vyras and Lat. vir (a man) and Skt. vira (man, hero).
    • Lith. angis and Lat. anguis (a snake in Latin, a species of snakes in Lithuanian)
    • Lith. linas and Lat. linum (flax, compare with English 'linen')
    • Lith. ariu and Lat. aro (I plow)
    • Lith. jungiu and Lat. iungeo (I join)
    • Lith. gentys and Lat. gentes (tribes) and Skt. jánas (genus, race).
    • Lith. mėnesis and Lat. mensis and Skt masa (month)
    • Lith. dantys and Lat. dentes and Skt dantas (teeth)
    • Lith. naktys and Lat. noctes and Skt. nakt (night)
    • Lith. sėdime and Lat. sedemus (we sit) and Skt. siedati (sits).

    Friday, September 25, 2009

    New paper on Indian Population History - "No Truth to the Aryan-Dravidian Theory"

    For the last couple of days many euro-centric bloggers assumed this study 'proves' that North Indians came from Europe via the alleged Aryan Invasion a few thousand years ago. Check out Dienekes blog for instance. Well, co-authors of the study say something else:

    Times of India
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/india/Aryan-Dravidian-divide-a-myth-Study/articleshow/5053274.cms
    HYDERABAD: The great Indian divide along north-south lines now stands blurred. A pathbreaking study by Harvard and indigenous researchers on

    ancestral Indian populations says there is a genetic relationship between all Indians and more importantly, the hitherto believed ``fact'' that Aryans and Dravidians signify the ancestry of north and south Indians might after all, be a myth.

    ``This paper rewrites history... there is no north-south divide,'' Lalji Singh, former director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) and a co-author of the study, said at a press conference here on Thursday.

    Senior CCMB scientist Kumarasamy Thangarajan said there was no truth to the Aryan-Dravidian theory as they came hundreds or thousands of years after the ancestral north and south Indians had settled in India.

    The study analysed 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups from 13 states. All the individuals were from six-language families and traditionally ``upper'' and ``lower'' castes and tribal groups. ``The genetics proves that castes grew directly out of tribe-like organizations during the formation of the Indian society,'' the study said. Thangarajan noted that it was impossible to distinguish between castes and tribes since their genetics proved they were not systematically different.

    The study was conducted by CCMB scientists in collaboration with researchers at Harvard Medical School,
    Harvard School of Public Health and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. It reveals that the present-day Indian population is a mix of ancient north and south bearing the genomic contributions from two distinct ancestral populations - the Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and the Ancestral South Indian (ASI).

    ``The initial settlement took place 65,000 years ago in the Andamans and in ancient south India around the same time, which led to population growth in this part,'' said Thangarajan. He added, ``At a later stage, 40,000 years ago, the ancient north Indians emerged which in turn led to rise in numbers here. But at some point of time, the ancient north and the ancient south mixed, giving birth to a different set of population. And that is the population which exists now and there is a genetic relationship between the population within India.''

    The study also helps understand why the incidence of genetic diseases among Indians is different from the rest of the world. Singh said that 70% of Indians were burdened with genetic disorders and the study could help answer why certain conditions restricted themselves to one population. For instance, breast cancer among Parsi women, motor neuron diseases among residents of Tirupati and Chittoor, or sickle cell anaemia among certain tribes in central India and the North-East can now be understood better, said researchers.

    The researchers, who are now keen on exploring whether Eurasians descended from ANI, find in their study that ANIs are related to western Eurasians, while the ASIs do not share any similarity with any other population across the world. However, researchers said there was no scientific proof of whether Indians went to Europe first or the other way round.

    Migratory route of Africans

    Between 135,000 and 75,000 years ago, the East-African droughts shrunk the water volume of the lake Malawi by at least 95%, causing migration out of Africa. Which route did they take? Researchers say their study of the tribes of Andaman and Nicobar islands using complete mitochondrial DNA sequences and its comparison those of world populations has led to the theory of a ``southern coastal route'' of migration from East Africa through India.

    This finding is against the prevailing view of a northern route of migration via Middle East, Europe, south-east Asia, Australia and then to India.


    I guess that as time goes by Aryan Invasion theorists will whittle down their 'theory' to "White Caucasian  Horse Riding  Proto-Indo-European Language Teacher That Digs Black Indian Aboroginal Chicks Changes The Indian Genetic Landscape Theory". :)

    Thursday, September 24, 2009

    New paper on Indian Population History

    Reconstructing Indian population history
    David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price & Lalji Singh

    "India has been underrepresented in genome-wide surveys of human variation. We analyse 25 diverse groups in India to provide strong evidence for two ancient populations, genetically divergent, that are ancestral to most Indians today. One, the 'Ancestral North Indians' (ANI), is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans, whereas the other, the 'Ancestral South Indians' (ASI), is as distinct from ANI and East Asians as they are from each other. By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations, we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 39–71% in most Indian groups, and is higher in traditionally upper caste and Indo-European speakers. Groups with only ASI ancestry may no longer exist in mainland India. However, the indigenous Andaman Islanders are unique in being ASI-related groups without ANI ancestry. Allele frequency differences between groups in India are larger than in Europe, reflecting strong founder effects whose signatures have been maintained for thousands of years owing to endogamy. We therefore predict that there will be an excess of recessive diseases in India, which should be possible to screen and map genetically."

    Editor's Summary


    24 September 2009

    Meet the ancestors: Indian population history from gene screening

    Analysis of genetic variation in 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups in India reveals that two ancient, genetically divergent populations are ancestral to most Indians today. One lineage, termed Ancestral North Indian, is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians and Europeans. The other, Ancestral South Indian, is not close to any group outside the subcontinent. The answers to several long-standing questions emerge from this work. It seems that 'caste' has been a powerful force shaping marriage in India for thousands of years — some anthropologists argued that its current strength was a product of British colonialism. And the enigmatic 'Negritos' of the Andaman Islands are identified as an ancient isolate from the Ancestral South Indian population. Allele frequency differences between population groups are high, in part due to the custom of within-group marriages, so it is likely that there is an excess of recessive diseases in India that can be screened for and mapped genetically.

     
     


    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/full/nature08365.html

    Saturday, September 12, 2009

    R2 Frequency Within 77 Indian Populations

    I extracted these figures from the link below. This was not a study of haplogroup frequency within specific communities but a general study of the distribution and frequency of haplogroups amongst high caste, low caste and tribal people of India(only some states). The results listed below are by no means indicative of R2 frequency within those communities because the sample sizes are very small in many instances. I just compiled this out of curiosity. For full information: A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios - Sahoo et al. , Supplemental Material

    Uttar Pradesh
    Tharu - 16.6%
    Khatri - 14%
    Kanyakubj Brahmin - 10%
    Bihar
    Yadav - 50%
    Baniya - 36%
    Kurmi - 15%
    Bhumihar - 10%
    Kayastha - 7%
    Bihar Brahmin - 5%
    West Bengal
    Karmali - 100%
    Mahishya - 23.5%
    Namasudra - 23%
    Maheli - 15.5%
    Orissa
    Khandayat - 46%
    Karan - 22%
    Gope - 18.75%
    Paroja - 15.3%
    Oriya Brahmin - 12.5%
    Himachal Pradesh
    HP Rajput - 13.3%
    Andhra Pradesh
    Kamma Chaudhary - 73.3% 
    Kappu Naidu - 72.2%
    Komati - 70%
    Reddy - 25%
    Chenchu - 20%
    Raju - 10.5%
    Lambadi - 5.5%
    Karnataka
    Lingayat - 30%
    Karnataka Muslim - 25%
    Karnataka Christian - 14%
    Kuruva - 10%
    Bhovi - 7%
    Tamil Nadu
    Kallar - 44%
    Gounder - 35%
    Vanniyar - 30%
    Chenchu - 20%
    Pallar - 13.3%
    Chakkliar - 11.1%
    Gujarat
    Gujarat Patel - 11%
    Maharashtra
    Dhangar - 25%
    Chitpavan Brahmin - 20%
    Madia Gond - 7%
    Desasth Brahmin - 6%
    Maratha - 6%
    Pawara - 6%


    0%

    Uttar Pradesh - Bhoksha, Kurmi, Thakur, Jaunsari. West Bengal - Bauri, Lodha, Kora.  Bihar - Rajput. Jharkhand - Bhumij, Birhor, Ho, Khari, Munda, Santhal, Oroan. Sikkim  - Nepali, Bhutia. Manipur - Muslim. Arunachal Pradesh - Adi Pasi. Mizoram - Hmar, Kuki, Lai, Lusei, Mara Orissa -Juang, Saora. Andhra Pradesh - Brahmin, Naikpod Gond, Yerukula. Karnataka - Gowda, Iyengar. Tamil Nadu -Irular. Maharashtra - Katkari, Mahadeo Koli.

    Friday, September 11, 2009

    Map of Aryan and Dravidian Languages in India

    Aryan(Indo-European) Languages

    Dravidian Languages

    Spatial frequency distribution map of Y-chromosome haplogroup R2 in South Asia.

    From:
    A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios.- Sahoo et al.


    Abstract:

    Understanding the genetic origins and demographic history of Indian populations is important both for questions concerning the early settlement of Eurasia and more recent events, including the appearance of Indo-Aryan languages and settled agriculture in the subcontinent. Although there is general agreement that Indian caste and tribal populations share a common late Pleistocene maternal ancestry in India, some studies of the Y-chromosome markers have suggested a recent, substantial incursion from Central or West Eurasia. To investigate the origin of paternal lineages of Indian populations, 936 Y chromosomes, representing 32 tribal and 45 caste groups from all four major linguistic groups of India, were analyzed for 38 single-nucleotide polymorphic markers. Phylogeography of the major Y-chromosomal haplogroups in India, genetic distance, and admixture analyses all indicate that the recent external contribution to Dravidian- and Hindi-speaking caste groups has been low. The sharing of some Y-chromosomal haplogroups between Indian and Central Asian populations is most parsimoniously explained by a deep, common ancestry between the two regions, with diffusion of some Indian-specific lineages northward. The Y-chromosomal data consistently suggest a largely South Asian origin for Indian caste communities and therefore argue against any major influx, from regions north and west of India, of people associated either with the development of agriculture or the spread of the Indo-Aryan language family. The dyadic Y-chromosome composition of Tibeto-Burman speakers of India, however, can be attributed to a recent demographic process, which appears to have absorbed and overlain populations who previously spoke Austro-Asiatic languages.


    Conclusion:

    It is not necessary, based on the current evidence, to look beyond South Asia for the origins of the paternal heritage of the majority of Indians at the time of the onset of settled agriculture. The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through the northwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny. Recent claims for a linkage of haplogroups J2, L, R1a, and R2 with a contemporaneous origin for the majority of the Indian castes' paternal lineages from outside the subcontinent are rejected, although our findings do support a local origin of haplogroups F* and H. Of the others, only J2 indicates an unambiguous recent external contribution, from West Asia rather than Central Asia. The current distributions of haplogroup frequencies are, with the exception of the O lineages, predominantly driven by geographical, rather than cultural determinants. Ironically, it is in the northeast of India, among the TB groups that there is clear-cut evidence for large-scale demic diffusion traceable by genes, culture, and language, but apparently not by agriculture.

     
      
      
     

    Saturday, September 5, 2009

    R2's Genetic Journey - from National Geographics Genographic Project


    Your Y-chromosome results identify you as a member of haplogroup R2.

    The genetic markers that define your ancestral history reach back roughly 60,000 years to the first common marker of all non-African men, M168, and follow your lineage to present day, ending with M124, the defining marker of haplogroup R2.

    If you look at the map highlighting your ancestors' route, you will see that members of haplogroup R2 carry the following Y-chromosome markers:

    M168 > M89 > M9 > M45 > M207 > M124

    What's a haplogroup, and why do geneticists concentrate on the Y chromosome in their search for markers? For that matter, what's a marker?

    Each of us carries DNA that is a combination of genes passed from both our mother and father, giving us traits that range from eye color and height to athleticism and disease susceptibility. One exception is the Y chromosome, which is passed directly from father to son, unchanged, from generation to generation.

    Unchanged, that is unless a mutation - a random, naturally occurring, usually harmless change occurs. The mutation, known as a marker, acts as a beacon; it can be mapped through generations because it will be passed down from the man in whom it occurred to his sons, their sons, and every male in his family for thousands of years.

    In some instances there may be more than one mutational event that defines a particular branch on the tree. This means that any of these markers can be used to determine your particular haplogroup, since every individual who has one of these markers also has the others.

    When geneticists identify such a marker, they try to figure out when it first occurred, and in which geographic region of the world. Each marker is essentially the beginning of a new lineage on the family tree of the human race. Tracking the lineages provides a picture of how small tribes of modern humans in Africa tens of thousands of years ago diversified and spread to populate the world.

    A haplogroup is defined by a series of markers that are shared by other men who carry the same random mutations. The markers trace the path your ancestors took as they moved out of Africa. It's difficult to know how many men worldwide belong to any particular haplogroup, or even how many haplogroups there are, because scientists simply don't have enough data yet.

    One of the goals of the five-year Genographic Project is to build a large enough database of anthropological genetic data to answer some of these questions. To achieve this, project team members are traveling to all corners of the world to collect more than 100,000 DNA samples from indigenous populations. In addition, we encourage you to contribute your anonymous results to the project database, helping our geneticists reveal more of the answers to our ancient past.

    Keep checking these pages; as more information is received, more may be learned about your own genetic history.

    Your Ancestral Journey: What We Know Now

    M168: Your Earliest Ancestor

     Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: Roughly 50,000 years ago

    Place of Origin: Africa

    Climate: Temporary retreat of Ice Age; Africa moves from drought to warmer temperatures and moister conditions

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 10,000

    Tools and Skills: Stone tools; earliest evidence of art and advanced conceptual skills

    Skeletal and archaeological evidence suggest that anatomically modern humans evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago, and began moving out of Africa to colonize the rest of the world around 60,000 years ago.

    The man who gave rise to the first genetic marker in your lineage probably lived in northeast Africa in the region of the Rift Valley, perhaps in present-day Ethiopia , Kenya, or Tanzania, some 31,000 to 79,000 years ago. Scientists put the most likely date for when he lived at around 50,000 years ago. His descendants became the only lineage to survive outside of Africa, making him the common ancestor of every non-African man living today.

    But why would man have first ventured out of the familiar African hunting grounds and into unexplored lands? It is likely that a fluctuation in climate may have provided the impetus for your ancestors' exodus out of Africa.

    The African ice age was characterized by drought rather than by cold. It was around 50,000 years ago that the ice sheets of northern Europe began to melt, introducing a period of warmer temperatures and moister climate in Africa. Parts of the inhospitable Sahara briefly became habitable. As the drought-ridden desert changed to a savanna, the animals hunted by your ancestors expanded their range and began moving through the newly emerging green corridor of grasslands. Your nomadic ancestors followed the good weather and the animals they hunted, although the exact route they followed remains to be determined.

    In addition to a favorable change in climate, around this same time there was a great leap forward in modern humans' intellectual capacity. Many scientists believe that the emergence of language gave us a huge advantage over other early human species. Improved tools and weapons, the ability to plan ahead and cooperate with one another, and an increased capacity to exploit resources in ways we hadn't been able to earlier, all allowed modern humans to rapidly migrate to new territories, exploit new resources, and replace other hominids.

    M89: Moving Through the Middle East

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 45,000 years ago

    Place: Northern Africa or the Middle East

    Climate: Middle East: Semiarid grass plains

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands

    Tools and Skills: Stone, ivory, wood tools

    The next male ancestor in your ancestral lineage is the man who gave rise to M89, a marker found in 90 to 95 percent of all non-Africans. This man was born around 45,000 years ago in northern Africa or the Middle East.

    The first people to leave Africa likely followed a coastal route that eventually ended in Australia. Your ancestors followed the expanding grasslands and plentiful game to the Middle East and beyond, and were part of the second great wave of migration out of Africa.

    Beginning about 40,000 years ago, the climate shifted once again and became colder and more arid. Drought hit Africa and the grasslands reverted to desert, and for the next 20,000 years, the Saharan Gateway was effectively closed. With the desert impassable, your ancestors had two options: remain in the Middle East, or move on. Retreat back to the home continent was not an option.

    While many of the descendants of M89 remained in the Middle East, others continued to follow the great herds of buffalo, antelope, woolly mammoths, and other game through what is now modern-day Iran to the vast steppes of Central Asia.

    These semiarid grass-covered plains formed an ancient "superhighway" stretching from eastern France to Korea. Your ancestors, having migrated north out of Africa into the Middle East, then traveled both east and west along this Central Asian superhighway. A smaller group continued moving north from the Middle East to Anatolia and the Balkans, trading familiar grasslands for forests and high country.

    M9: The Eurasian Clan Spreads Wide and Far

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 40,000 years ago

    Place: Iran or southern Central Asia

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic

    Your next ancestor, a man born around 40,000 years ago in Iran or southern Central Asia, gave rise to a genetic marker known as M9, which marked a new lineage diverging from the M89 Middle Eastern Clan. His descendants, of which you are one, spent the next 30,000 years populating much of the planet.

    This large lineage, known as the Eurasian Clan, dispersed gradually over thousands of years. Seasoned hunters followed the herds ever eastward, along the vast super highway of Eurasian steppe. Eventually their path was blocked by the massive mountain ranges of south Central Asia - the Hindu Kush, the Tian Shan, and the Himalayas.

    The three mountain ranges meet in a region known as the "Pamir Knot," located in present-day Tajikistan. Here the tribes of hunters split into two groups. Some moved north into Central Asia, others moved south into what is now Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent.

    These different migration routes through the Pamir Knot region gave rise to separate lineages.
    Most people native to the Northern Hemisphere trace their roots to the Eurasian Clan. Nearly all North Americans and East Asians are descended from the man described above, as are most Europeans and many Indians.

    M45: The Journey Through Central Asia

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 35,000

    Place of Origin: Central Asia

    Climate: Glaciers expanding over much of Europe

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 100,000

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic (link)

    The next marker of your genetic heritage, M45, arose around 35,000 years ago, in a man born in Central Asia. He was part of the M9 Eurasian Clan that had moved to the north of the mountainous Hindu Kush and onto the game-rich steppes of present-day Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and southern Siberia.

    Although big game was plentiful, the environment on the Eurasian steppes became increasing hostile as the glaciers of the Ice Age began to expand once again. The reduction in rainfall may have induced desertlike conditions on the southern steppes, forcing your ancestors to follow the herds of game north.

    To exist in such harsh conditions, they learned to build portable animal-skin shelters and to create weaponry and hunting techniques that would prove successful against the much larger animals they encountered in the colder climates. They compensated for the lack of stone they traditionally used to make weapons by developing smaller points and blades- microliths that could be mounted to bone or wood handles and used effectively. Their tool kit also included bone needles for sewing animal-skin clothing that would both keep them warm and allow them the range of movement needed to hunt the reindeer and mammoth that kept them fed.

    Your ancestors' resourcefulness and ability to adapt was critical to survival during the last ice age in Siberia, a region where no other hominid species is known to have lived.

    The M45 Central Asian Clan gave rise to many more; the man who was its source is the common ancestor of most Europeans and nearly all Native American men.

    M207: Leaving Central Asia

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 30,000

    Place of Origin: Central Asia

    Climate: Glaciers expanding over much of Europe and western Eurasia

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 100,000

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic

    After spending considerable time in Central Asia, refining skills to survive in harsh new conditions and exploit new resources, a group from the Central Asian Clan began to head west towards the European subcontinent.

    An individual in this clan carried the new M207 mutation on his Y chromosome. His descendants ultimately split into two distinct groups, with one continuing onto the European subcontinent, making this man the ancestor of most Western European men alive today.

    But your genetic lineage does not descend from this westward migrating band of hunter-gatherers. The second group did not head west into Europe, but rather likely turned south, ultimately ending their journey in the Indian subcontinent and giving rise to many men whose lineages survive there today. This distribution adds weight to linguistic and archaeological evidence suggesting that a large migration from the Asian steppes into India occurred within the last 10,000 years.

    M124: Southward to the Indus Valley

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 25,000

    Place of Origin: Southern Central Asia

    Climate: Ice Age

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Hundreds of Thousands

    Tools and Skills: Middle Upper Paleolithic

    About 25,000 years ago one of your ancestors, who lived in southern Central Asia, first displayed the genetic marker M124. Today M124 defines your haplogroup R2.

    The descendants of the first man to carry M124 migrated southward in a forked pattern. They inhabited what is now Pakistan and also, further east, modern India. Today members of haplogroup R2 are found in Northern India, Pakistan and southern Central Asia at frequencies of five to ten percent. Individuals belonging to your R2 lineage made their way as part of the second major wave of human migration into India long after a large wave of African migrants traveled along the Indian coastline some 50,000 to 60,000 years ago.

    In addition, members of this distinctive lineage are also found in Eastern Europe among the Gypsy populations of that region. The story told in their genes ties these wandering peoples back to their ancient origins on the Indian subcontinent.

    However, the ancient Indian migrations and the distribution of genetic lineages that they ultimately gave rise to remain mysterious. This is because we have precious little data with which to uncover the history of this haplogroup.

    Highlights of a study by Sanghamitra Sengupta et al, 2006

    • Haplogroup R2 is present both in Dravidian and Indo-European populations, implying that R2 has a pan-Indian presence, and is not restricted to any linguistic group.
    • The frequencies of R2 seem to mirror the frequencies of R1a (i.e. both lineages are strong and weak in the same social and linguistic subgroups). This may indicate that both R1a and R2 moved into India at roughly the same time or co-habited, although more research is needed.
    • R1a1 and R2 haplogroups indicate demographic complexity that is inconsistent with a recent single history.
    • R2 has a particularly strong presence in the Indian states of West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat, and in the area of Mumbai (Bombay).
    • Contrary to the findings of Spencer Wells, the paper claims that there is no evidence that Central Asia was the source of the R1a and R2 lineages in India. The theory that Central Asia could have been the recipient of the two lineages from India should not be ruled out.
    • Some of the other studies like Bamshad et al., 2001, Kivisild et al., 2003 found Haplogroup 1(the old representation for non-R1a1 Haplogroup R subclades) at around 40% among Telugus of coastal Andhra Pradesh. The identification of this Haplogroup with R2 is confirmed from Sanghamitra Sahoo et al., 2006 study which observed R2 ranging from 35% to 55% among non-Brahmin castes of this region.

    Thursday, September 3, 2009

    Map of R2 frequency and YSTR variance in India

    Indian Y-DNA Frequency

    1. 146/728 = 20.05% H1-M52(xH1a1-M197, H1a3-M39)
    2. 115/728 = 15.8% R1a1a-M17
    3. 106/728 = 14.56% O2a-M95
    4. 68/728 = 9.34% R2-M124
    5. 58/728 = 7.97% O3a3c-M134
    6. 46/728 = 6.32% L1-M76
    7. 38/728 = 5.22% J2b2-M241
    8. 38/728 = 5.22% F*-M89/M213
    9. 29/728 = 3.98% H*-M69(xH1-M52, H2-Apt)
    10. 26/728 = 3.57% J2a-M410(xJ2a4b-M67, J2a4h2-M158)
    11. 16/728 = 2.2% H2-Apt
    12. 11/728 = 1.51% C5-M356
    13. 9/728 = 1.24% G2a-P15
    14. 4/728 = 0.55% R1b1b2-M269
    15. 3/728 = 0.41% L3-M357
    16. 3/728 = 0.41% Q1a3-M346
    17. 3/728 = 0.41% O3-M122(xO3a3c-M134)
    18. 2/728 = 0.27% C*-M216/RPS4Y
    19. 2/728 = 0.27% J2a4h2-M158
    20. 2/728 = 0.27% J1-M267
    21. 2/728 = 0.27% R*-M207(xR1-M173, R2-M124)
    22. 1/728 = 0.14% H1a1-M197
    Sengupta et al 2006

    South Indian Y-DNA

    Complete South Indian Y-DNA data from Watkins et al. (2008) and Sengupta et al. (2006)

    Watkins et al. (2008)

    Tamil Nadu
    Upper Caste
    3/41 = 7.3% C-M216
    2/41 = 4.9% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    1/41 = 2.4% G-M201
    4/41 = 9.8% H1-M52(xH1a-M82)
    1/41 = 2.4% H1a-M82
    2/41 = 4.9% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    3/41 = 7.3% J2a-M410
    1/41 = 2.4% L-M20(xL1-M76)
    3/41 = 7.3% L1-M76
    14/41 = 34.1% R1a1a-M17
    7/41 = 17.1% R2-M124

    Non-Tamil-speaking Upper Caste
    1/37 = 2.7% C-M216
    2/37 = 5.4% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    7/37 = 18.9% H1a-M82
    2/37 = 5.4% J2a-M410
    2/37 = 5.4% K-M9(xL-M20, M1-M5, M2a-SRY9138, N1-LLY22g, O-M175, P-M74, T-M70)
    4/37 = 10.8% L1-M76
    16/37 = 43.2% R1a1a-M17
    3/37 = 8.1% R2-M124

    Middle Caste
    6/43 = 14.0% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    7/43 = 16.3% H1a-M82
    1/43 = 2.3% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    6/43 = 14.0% J2a-M410
    1/43 = 2.3% L-M20(xL1-M76)
    9/43 = 20.9% L1-M76
    8/43 = 18.6% R1a1a-M17
    5/43 = 11.6% R2-M124

    Lower Caste
    1/34 = 2.9% C-M216
    7/34 = 20.6% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    12/34 = 35.3% H1a-M82
    3/34 = 8.8% J2a-M410
    1/34 = 2.9% L-M20(xL1-M76)
    3/34 = 8.8% Q1-P36(xQ1a3a-M3)
    7/34 = 20.6% R1a1a-M17

    Andhra Pradesh
    Upper Caste
    1/33 = 3.0% C-M216
    1/33 = 3.0% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    1/33 = 3.0% G-M201
    5/33 = 15.2% H1a-M82
    3/33 = 9.1% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    2/33 = 6.1% L1-M76
    17/33 = 51.5% R1a1a-M17
    1/33 = 3.0% R1b1b2-M269
    2/33 = 6.1% R2-M124

    Middle Caste
    2/80 = 2.5% C-M216
    4/80 = 5.0% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    20/80 = 25.0% H1a-M82
    8/80 = 10.0% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    4/80 = 5.0% J2a-M410
    2/80 = 2.5% L-M20(xL1-M76)
    13/80 = 16.3% L1-M76
    2/80 = 2.5% Q1-P36(xQ1a3a-M3)
    15/80 = 18.8% R1a1a-M17
    10/80 = 12.5% R2-M124

    Lower Caste
    3/54 = 5.6% C-M216
    11/54 = 20.4% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    1/54 = 1.9% G-M201
    1/54 = 1.9% H1-M52(xH1a-M82)
    10/54 = 18.5% H1a-M82
    3/54 = 5.6% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    7/54 = 13.0% L1-M76
    1/54 = 1.9% O3-M122
    1/54 = 1.9% Q1-P36(xQ1a3a-M3)
    9/54 = 16.7% R1a1a-M17
    7/54 = 13.0% R2-M124

    South Indians (total)
    11/322 = 3.4% C-M216
    33/322 = 10.2% F-M89(xG-M201, H1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)
    3/322 = 0.9% G-M201
    5/322 = 1.6% H1-M52(xH1a-M82)
    62/322 = 19.3% H1a-M82
    17/322 = 5.3% J2-M172(xJ2a-M410)
    18/322 = 5.6% J2a-M410
    2/322 = 0.6% K-M9(xL-M20, M1-M5, M2a-SRY9138, N1-LLY22g, O-M175, P-M74, T-M70)
    5/322 = 1.6% L-M20(xL1-M76)
    38/322 = 11.8% L1-M76
    1/322 = 0.3% O3-M122
    6/322 = 1.9% Q1-P36(xQ1a3a-M3)
    86/322 = 26.7% R1a1a-M17
    1/322 = 0.3% R1b1b2-M269
    34/322 = 10.6% R2-M124


    Sengupta et al. (2006)

    Irula (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    1/30 = 3.3% C5-M356
    9/30 = 30.0% F*-M89/M213
    8/30 = 26.7% H1-M52
    5/30 = 16.7% H2-APT
    1/30 = 3.3% J1-M267
    3/30 = 10.0% L1-M76
    3/30 = 10.0% R2-M124

    Koya Dora (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    3/27 = 11.1% F*-M89/M213
    6/27 = 22.2% H1-M52
    4/27 = 14.8% H2-APT
    1/27 = 3.7% J2a-M410
    13/27 = 48.1% O2a-M95

    Kota (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    1/16 = 6.25% F*-M89/M213
    9/16 = 56.25% H1-M52
    2/16 = 12.5% R1a1a-M17
    4/16 = 25.0% R2-M124

    Konda Reddy (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    7/30 = 23.3% F*-M89/M213
    1/30 = 3.3% H1-M52
    20/30 = 66.7% O2a-M95
    2/30 = 6.7% R1a1a-M17

    Kurumba (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    2/19 = 10.5% F*-M89/M213
    1/19 = 5.3% H-M69
    13/19 = 68.4% H1-M52
    1/19 = 5.3% L1-M76
    2/19 = 10.5% R2-M124

    Toda (India, South; Tribe; Dravidian)
    1/8 = 12.5% C*-M216/RPS4Y
    2/8 = 25.0% J2a-M410
    4/8 = 50.0% L1-M76
    1/8 = 12.5% R1a1a-M17

    Pallan (India, South; Low caste; Dravidian)
    1/29 = 3.4% C*-M216/RPS4Y
    2/29 = 6.9% F*-M89/M213
    4/29 = 13.8% H1-M52
    1/29 = 3.4% H2-APT
    1/29 = 3.4% J2a-M410
    3/29 = 10.3% J2b2-M241
    4/29 = 13.8% L1-M76
    1/29 = 3.4% L3-M357
    7/29 = 24.1% R1a1a-M17
    1/29 = 3.4% R1b1b2-M269
    4/29 = 13.8% R2-M124

    Vanniyar (India, South; Middle caste; Dravidian)
    1/25 = 4.0% C5-M356
    4/25 = 16.0% F*-M89/M213
    2/25 = 8.0% H-M69
    4/25 = 16.0% H1-M52
    2/25 = 8.0% J2a-M410
    2/25 = 8.0% J2b2-M241
    5/25 = 20.0% L1-M76
    2/25 = 8.0% R1a1a-M17
    3/25 = 12.0% R2-M124

    Vellalar (India, South; Middle caste; Dravidian)
    9/31 = 29.0% H1-M52
    12/31 = 38.7% J2b2-M241
    5/31 = 16.1% L1-M76
    1/31 = 3.2% Q1a3-M346
    4/31 = 12.9% R1a1a-M17

    Ambalakarar (India, South; Middle caste; Dravidian)
    2/29 = 6.9% F*-M89/M213
    1/29 = 3.4% G2a-P15
    10/29 = 34.5% H-M69
    4/29 = 13.8% H1-M52
    2/29 = 6.9% J2b2-M241
    6/29 = 20.7% L1-M76
    4/29 = 13.8% R1a1a-M17

    Iyengar (India, South; High caste; Dravidian)
    4/30 = 13.3% G2a-P15
    3/30 = 10.0% H1-M52
    4/30 = 13.3% J2a-M410
    1/30 = 3.3% J2a4h2-M158
    1/30 = 3.3% J2b2-M241
    5/30 = 16.7% L1-M76
    9/30 = 30.0% R1a1a-M17
    3/30 = 10.0% R2-M124

    Iyer (India, South; High caste; Dravidian)
    2/29 = 6.9% C5-M356
    3/29 = 10.3% G2a-P15
    1/29 = 3.4% H-M69
    1/29 = 3.4% H1-M52
    4/29 = 13.8% J2a-M410
    1/29 = 3.4% J2b2-M241
    5/29 = 17.2% L1-M76
    1/29 = 3.4% R*-M207
    8/29 = 27.6% R1a1a-M17
    3/29 = 10.3% R2-M124

    South Indian total (Dravidian)
    2/303 = 0.66% C*-M216/RPS4Y
    4/303 = 1.32% C5-M356
    30/303 = 9.90% F*-M89/M213
    8/303 = 2.64% G2a-P15
    14/303 = 4.62% H*-M69(xH1-M52, H2-Apt)
    62/303 = 20.46% H1-M52(xH1a1-M197, H1a3-M39)
    10/303 = 3.30% H2-Apt
    1/303 = 0.33% J1-M267
    14/303 = 4.62% J2a-M410(xJ2a4b-M67, J2a4h2-M158)
    1/303 = 0.33% J2a4h2-M158
    21/303 = 6.93% J2b2-M241
    38/303 = 12.54% L1-M76
    1/303 = 0.33% L3-M357
    33/303 = 10.89% O2a-M95
    1/303 = 0.33% Q1a3-M346
    1/303 = 0.33% R*-M207(xR1-M173, R2-M124)
    39/303 = 12.87% R1a1a-M17
    1/303 = 0.33% R1b1b2-M269
    22/303 = 7.26% R2-M124

    Tuesday, September 1, 2009

    Y-DNA Haplogroup R2 Frequency - compiled from various sources

    Jaunpur Kshatriyas (India) – 87.2%
    Sinte Romany (Uzbekistan)– 53%
    Kurmanj (Georgia)-  44%
    Sinhalese (Sri Lanka) -  38.5%
    Lodha (India) -  35%
    Dhangar (India) -  29.4%
    Chitpavan Brahmin (India) – 26%
    Newar (Nepal) -  25.8%
    Punjab Brahmin (India) -  25%
    South India  -  23.6%
    West Bengal Brahmin (India) -   23%
    Parsis (Pakistan) -  20%
    Gujarat Bhils (India) -  18.18%
    Hunza (Pakistan)  -  18.4%
    Jaunpur Vaishyas (India) -  18%
    Bartangi (Tajikistan) – 17%
    Chechnya – 16%
    East India  -  15.5%
    Jaunpur Shudras (India)  -  14.3%
    Burusho (Pakistan) -  14%
    Kashmiri Pandits (India) -  13.73%
    Pallans (India) -  14%
    M.P. Brahmin (India) -  11.9%
    Desasth Brahmin (India) – 10.5%
    Kathmandu (Nepal) -  10.4%
    India -  10%
    Gujarat Brahmins (India) -  9.38%
    Yadhava (India)  -   9%
    Khoiant (Tajikistan) -   9%
    Kashmiri Gujars (India) - 8.16%
    Pakistan -  8%
    Ishkashimi (Tajikistan) -   8%
    Samarkand (Uzbekistan) -   8%
    Kurmanj (Turkmenistan) -  8%
    Chenchu (South India)  -  7.3%
    Karakalpak (Uzbekistan)-   7%
    Tamil Nadu (India) -  7%
    Central Asia & Siberia  -  6.5%
    West India  -  6.4%
    North India  -  6.2%
    Central India  -  6%
    Kalmyks - 6%
    Dushanbe (Tajikistan)-   6%
    Esphahan (Iran)-    6%
    Maratha (India) -  5.3%
    M.P. Saharia (India) -  5.37%
    Bihar Brahmin (India) -  5.26%
    Himachal Brahmin (India) -  5.26%
    Fergana Valley (Uzbekistan) -   5%
    Dungan (Kyrgyzstan)-   5%
    Punjab (India) -  5%
    Kallar (India) -   5%
    Jaunpur Brahmins (India) -  5%
    Southeast Anatolia -  4.7%
    Tamang (Nepal) -  4.4%
    AP tribes (India) - 4%
    Sourashtran (India) -   4%
    Georgians -  3 – 4%
    Uyghurs -  3 – 4%
    Central Asia -  3.6%
    Jaunpur Panchamas (India)  -  3.6%
    North-Central Anatolia -  3.5%
    Gujarat (India)  -  3.5%
    Maharashtra Brahmin (India) -  3.33%
    U.P. Brahmins (India)  - 3.23%
    North Iran  -  3%
    Turkmenistan – 3%
    Azerbaijan – 3%
    Kumyks – 2.6%
    Avars – 2.4%
    Armenia - 2%
    Kazak (Kazakhstan) -   2%
    Bukhara (Uzbekistan) -   2%
    Tashkent (Uzbekistan) -   2%
    Northwest Anatolia -  1.9%
    Qatar  -  1.4%
    Mongolia/Buryatia -  1.3%
    Penzenskaja (Russia)  -  1.2%
    Central Anatolia -  1.1%
    Teheran (Iran) -   1%
    Khurezm (Turkmenistan) -   1%
    Surkhandarya (Turkmenistan) -   1%
    Repievka (Southern Russia) -  1%
    Turkey – 1%
    Egypt  -  1%
    South Iran  -  0.85%
    European Americans (U.S.)  -  0.8%
    Tibet – 0.6%
    Hungary – 0.47%
    Lebanon  -  0.2%

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R2_%28Y-DNA%29
    http://www.ethnoancestry.com/index_files/index_data/Haplogroup_R2_Manoukian.pdf
    http://www.answers.com/topic/haplogroup-r2
    http://www.genebase.com/doc/Haplogroup_R_Table3.pdf

    Molecular Insight into the Genesis of Ranked Caste Populations of
    Western India Based Upon Polymorphisms Across Non-Recombinant
    and Recombinant Regions in Genome
    Sonali Gaikwad and VK Kashyap, 2005,Genome Biology

    Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosome Variation in the Caucasus
    Nasidze, 2004, Annals of Human Genetics

    The Genetic Heritage of the Earliest Settlers Persists Both in Indian
    Tribal and Caste Populations
    T. Kivisild et al, 2003,  The American Society of Human Genetics.

    The Eurasian Heartland: A Continental Perspective on Y-chromosome
    Diversity
    R. Spencer Wells, 2001, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    Announcement of population data
    Hungarian population data for 11 Y-STR and 49 Y-SNP markers
    Antonia Volgyi, Andrea Zala ´n, Eniko ? Szvetnik, Horolma Pamjav *
    Institute of Forensic Medicine, Institutes for Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement,
    P.O. Box 31, 1363 Budapest, Hungary
    Received 24 May 2007; received in revised form 28 April 2008; accepted 29 April 2008

    The Himalayas as a Directional Barrier to Gene Flow
    Tenzin Gayden, Alicia M. Cadenas, Maria Regueiro, Nanda B. Singh, Lev A. Zhivotovsky,
    Peter A. Underhill, Luigi L. Cavalli-Sforza, and Rene J. Herrera
    http://www.pnas.org/content/103/4/843/suppl/DC1
    Sharma et al 

    Saturday, August 29, 2009

    R2 Frequency

    Molecular Insight into the Genesis of Ranked Caste Populations of
    Western India Based Upon Polymorphisms Across Non-Recombinant
    and Recombinant Regions in Genome
    Sonali Gaikwad and VK Kashyap, 2005,Genome Biology.


    R2 Incidence in Western India:
    Dhangar 29.4%
    Chitpavan Brahmin 10.6%
    Desasth Brahmin 10.5%
    Maratha 5.3%

    Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosome Variation in the Caucasus
    I. Nasidze, 2004, Annals of Human Genetics


    R2 Frequency:
    Chechenia - 16%
    Azerbaijan -   3%
    Armenia -   2%
    Iran:
         Esphahan -   2%
         Teheran -   1%

    The Genetic Heritage of the Earliest Settlers Persists Both in Indian
    Tribal and Caste Populations
    T. Kivisild et al, 2003,  The American Society of Human Genetics.
    R2 Haplogroup in India Compared with Western Eurasia
    Population (n), Frequency (95% cr for proportion)


    India:
         West Bengal (31) 23%, Present study
         Punjab (66) 5%, Present study
         Tamil Nadu (259) 7%, Wells et al. 2001
         AP tribes (82) 4%, Present study
    Sinhalese (39) 38%, Present Study
    Tadjikistan (168) 6%, Wells et al. 2001
    Uzbeks (366) 2%, Wells et al. 2001
    Kyrgyzstan (92) 2%, Wells et al. 2001
    Kazakstan (95) 1%, Wells et al. 2001
    Iran (52) 2%, Wells et al. 2001

    The Eurasian Heartland: A Continental Perspective on Y-chromosome Diversity
    R. Spencer Wells, 2001, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA


    R2 Frequency:
    India (South):
         Yadhava -   9%
         Kallar -   5%
         Sourashtran -   4%

    Iran (Esphahan)  -   6%
    Kazakhstan (Kazak) -   2%
    Kyrgyzstan (Dungan) -   5%

    Tajikistan:
         Bartangi - 17%
         Khoiant -   9%
         Ishkashimi -   8%
         Dushanbe -   6%
         Turkmenistan -   3%
         Khurezm -   1%
         Surkhandarya -   1%

    Haplogroup R Tree

     
    Haplogroup R, subgroups and subclades.

    Wednesday, August 26, 2009

    R2 Haplogroup - Useful Links

    The Genographic Project
    This page (below) o
    n haplogroup R2 gives you an understanding about your deep ancestry. If you've done your dna testing with National Geographic's Genographic Project then you'd have already visited this site. And of course, besides R2 there's information on every other haplogroup as well.
















    Family Tree DNA
    Genographic Project members may upload their results to this site for free and their data will be here for 25 years(I think). As more people get their dna tests done, and ongoing research reveals more, you may keep visiting this site for updates. There's also a utility called Ysearch to find matches in their database, according to your genetic markers.

















    Digging into Haplogroup R2 (Y-DNA)
    A forum dedicated to R2 people. Discuss whatever information you want out here about haplogroup R2.














    dna-forums.org
    A Genetic Genealogy Forum















    Anthropology Forum
    A forum with topics ranging from genetics & genealogy, biological and cultural anthropology, ethnicity and various other related topics.