Showing posts with label R1a1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label R1a1. Show all posts

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Out of India after Africa? Nat Geo now supports this theory

"Modern humans migrated out of Africa via a southern route through Arabia, rather than a northern route by way of Egypt, according to research announced at a conference at the National Geographic Society this week.

“Evolutionary history shows that human populations likely originated in Africa, and the Genographic Project, the most extensive survey of human population genetic data to date, suggests where they went next…Modern humans migrated out of Africa via a southern route through Arabia, rather than a northern route by way of Egypt,” said a news statement released by IBM."


“The divergence of a common genetic history between populations showed that Eurasian groups were more similar to populations from southern India, than they were to those in Africa. This supports a southern route of migration from Africa via the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in Arabia before any movement heading north, and suggests a special role for south Asia in the ‘out of Africa’ expansion of modern humans.”

Full Story 

Other links:

Genographic Project confirms humans migrated from Africa through Arabia 

 

Sunday, September 12, 2010

ISOGG 2010 Y-DNA Haplogroup R

ISOGG 2010 Y-DNA Haplogroup R (link)
(click to enlarge)

It's now official, all R-M124 (previously R2) are now R2a.
• R2 M479
• • R2* -
• • R2a L266, M124, P249, P267

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Phylogenetic tree of human Y-chromosome haplogroups observed in Eurasians

 
click to enlarge
A couple of things I notice on the chart:
  1. R2 is shown as younger than R1/R1a/R1b, which I think is probably true.
  2. An Asian source for all Europeans - excluding haplogroup E.
link

    Saturday, February 13, 2010

    Thursday, February 11, 2010

    FTDNA's public yDNA haplogroup projects

    Projects  
    A ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Haplogroup_A/
    C ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Chaplogroup/
    E-M35 ................. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/E3b/
    F ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/F-YDNA/
    G ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/G-YDNA/
    G2c (formerly G5) ..... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/G2c/
    E1a  .................. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/HaplogroupE1andE/
    H ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/YHaploGroupH/
    I1 .................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/yDNA_I1/
    I2a ................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/I2aHapGroup/
    I2b2-L38 .............. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/I2b2/
    I-M223 ................ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/M223-Y-Clan/
    I-P109 "I1c" .......... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/yDNA_I-P109/
    I ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Haplogroup%20I%20Y-DNA%20Project%20Web%20Site/
    J ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Y-DNA_J/
    J2 .................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/J2%20Y%20DNA%20group/index.aspx/
    J2b_455-8 ............. http://tracingroots.nova.org/J2b_455-8.htm
    J2b-M102+ ............. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/m102/
    J2Plus ................ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/J2Plus/
    Jewish E3b ............ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/JewishE3bProject/
    Jewish Q .............. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Jewish_Q/
    L ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Y-Haplogroup-L/
    N ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/N%20Y-DNA%20Project/
    O...O3 ................ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/o3/
    Q3 American Indian .... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Amerind%20Y/
    Q ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/yDNA_Q/
    R* .................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Rasterisk/
    R1* ................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1Asterisk/
    R1a Y-DNA Haplogroup .. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1aY-Haplogroup/
    R1b and Subclades ..... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/r1b/
    R1b (U152+) ........... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c10/
    R1b Jewish ............ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/JewishR1b/
    R1b1* ................. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1Asterisk/
    R1b1b1 (aka R-M73) .... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1b1/
    R1b1b2a1b4 SRY2627+ ... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c6/
    r1b1b2Asterisk ........ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/r1b1b2/
    R1b-U106 .............. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106/
    R1b-U198/S29+ ......... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/U198/
    R2 .................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R2/
    R-ht35 (P312- U106-) .. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ht35new/
    R-L21Plus ............. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R-L21/
    R-M153 ................ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R-M153_The_Basque_Marker/
    R-M222 ................ http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/
    R-P312 and Subclades .. http://www.familytreedna.com/public/atlantic-r1b1c/
    T ..................... http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Y-Haplogroup-K2/
     
    Links to Join Projects (if you've tested with FTDNA)
    A ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=AYDNA
    C ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=C
    E-M35 .................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=E-M35_Project
    F ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=F-YDNA
    G ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=G_Haplogroup
    G2c (formerly G5) ...... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=G2c
    E1a .................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=HaplogroupE1a
    H ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=H-YDNA
    I1 ..................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I1
    I2a .................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I2a
    I2b2-L38 ............... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I-L38
    I-M223 ................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I2b
    I-P109 "I1c" ........... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I1c
    I ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=I-Y-DNA
    J ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=J-Y-DNA
    J2 ..................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=J2
    J2b_455-8 .............. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=J2b_455-8
    J2b-M102+ .............. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=M102plus
    J2Plus ................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=J2Plus
    Jewish E3b ............. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=Jewish_E3b
    Jewish Q ............... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=Jewish_Q
    L ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=L
    N ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=N-YDNA
    O...O3 ................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=O3
    Q3 American Indian ..... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=Q3_AmericanIndian
    Q ...................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=Q-YDNA
    R* ..................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R*
    R1* .................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1*
    R1a .................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1a
    R1b and Subclades ...... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b
    R1b (U152+) ............ https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b1c10
    R1b Jewish ............. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b_Jewish
    R1b1* .................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b1Asterisk
    R1b1b1 (aka R-M73) ..... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b1b
    R1b1b2a1b4 SRY2627+ .... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b1c6
    r1b1b2Asterisk ......... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=r1b1b2Asterisk
    R1b-U106 ............... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b-U106
    R1b-U198/S29+ .......... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R1b1b2g1
    R2 ..................... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R2
    R-ht35 (P312- U106-) ... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=ht35
    R-L21Plus .............. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R-L21Plus
    R-M153 ................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R-M153
    R-M222 ................. https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R-M222
    R-P312 and Subclades ... https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R-P312_and_Subclades
    T (formerly K2) ........ https://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=K2-Male 

    Saturday, December 5, 2009

    Indian scientist set to change world history

    Poorly written TOI article, but Singhs comments are interesting (I'm assuming the reporter quoted him correctly). 

    TNN 5 December 2009, 01:27am IST

    VARANASI: Was Max Muller at fault when he propagated the White Invasion theory? Did Aryan Invasion did not take place? Are we going to witness a change in world history? If reports of Prof Lalji Singh — an internationally acclaimed biotechnology expert — are to be believed, recent studies and research work on tracing genetic lineage of primitive human species have already suggested a different world history, enough to prove a major breakthrough in this field.

    Prof Singh of Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, who was in the city on Friday to inaugurate the three-day international conference on emerging trends in biotechnology organised by School of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University, told reporters that the recent studies would also change the theory of White Invasion (given by Max Muller of Germany).

    There was no White Invasion, neither there was any Aryan Invasion as was believed in the past, he said referring to the recent studies on diversity of Indian population that had been published in 'Nature' magazine. The studies indicated southern route of migration of East African population (believed to originate 70,000 years ago) towards Indian sub-continent via Gujarat coast and Andaman and Nicobar Islands, he added.

    Saying that Indian population was made up of many populations that have varied genetic compositions, he also added recent studies on DNA linkage indicated an invisible thread (trait) that bounded the Indian population comprising populations of other countries in the sub-continent including Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Malaysia, believed to have originated almost 33,000 years ago.

    "The study is on to trace the ancestors of Ancestor North Indian (ANI) population, while the ancestors of Ancestor South Indian (ASI) population has been already traced," he said. "Ongee and Jarva species have been established to be the ancestors of ASI population while DNA matching has found resemblance of East African population with Kurumbha species in Kerala and Raghuvanshi of West Bengal," he added.

    "We are looking for DNA from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Jammu and Kashmir to trace the origin of ANI population and once that is established, we would be in a position to indicate the movement of ANI population towards European countries that would change the face of world history," he said. "We are also waiting for clearance of Ministry of Environment and Forest to start major project on revival of endangered animal species including Asiatic lion, tiger, leopard and black buck through cloning technique. We are also working for standardisation of cloning process that would prove to be a milestone in conserving endangered animal species," he added.

    Prof Lalji Singh is also heading Laboratory for Conservation of Endangered Species (LACONES) for their revival in the country.

    Link

    Thursday, November 5, 2009

    Haplogroup R1a frequency and distribution map (2009)

    This map clearly shows that the expansion time of this haplogroup originating around the Indus Valley.

    Wednesday, November 4, 2009

    New study on Haplogroup R1a

    This study speaks against substantial gene flow from Eastern Europe since the mid holocene(1000 to 3000 years earlier than the purported time of the mythical Aryan Invasion of India):

    "the virtual absence of M458 chromosomes outside Europe speaks against substantial patrilineal gene flow from East Europe to Asia, including to India, at least since the mid-Holocene. "

    Separating the post-Glacial coancestry of European and Asian Y chromosomes within haplogroup R1a

    Underhill et al. - Nov 2009

    Abstract:

    Human Y-chromosome haplogroup structure is largely circumscribed by continental boundaries. One notable exception to this general pattern is the young haplogroup R1a that exhibits post-Glacial coalescent times and relates the paternal ancestry of more than 10% of men in a wide geographic area extending from South Asia to Central East Europe and South Siberia. Its origin and dispersal patterns are poorly understood as no marker has yet been described that would distinguish European R1a chromosomes from Asian. Here we present frequency and haplotype diversity estimates for more than 2000 R1a chromosomes assessed for several newly discovered SNP markers that introduce the onset of informative R1a subdivisions by geography. Marker M434 has a low frequency and a late origin in West Asia bearing witness to recent gene flow over the Arabian Sea. Conversely, marker M458 has a significant frequency in Europe, exceeding 30% in its core area in Eastern Europe and comprising up to 70% of all M17 chromosomes present there. The diversity and frequency profiles of M458 suggest its origin during the early Holocene and a subsequent expansion likely related to a number of prehistoric cultural developments in the region. Its primary frequency and diversity distribution correlates well with some of the major Central and East European river basins where settled farming was established before its spread further eastward. Importantly, the virtual absence of M458 chromosomes outside Europe speaks against substantial patrilineal gene flow from East Europe to Asia, including to India, at least since the mid-Holocene.

    Link

    Friday, October 30, 2009

    The Cradle that is India - Subhash Kak

    Ideas about early Indian history continue to play an important role in political ideology of contemporary India. On the one side are the Left and Dravidian parties, which believe that invading Aryans from the northwest pushed the Dravidians to south India and India's caste divisions are a consequence of that encounter. Even the development of Hinduism is seen through this anthropological lens. This view is essentially that of colonial historians which was developed over a hundred years ago.


    On the other side are the nationalist parties, which believe that the Aryan languages are native to India. These groups cite the early astronomical dates in the Vedas, noting these texts are rooted firmly in the Indian geographical region. But Leftist scholars consider such evidence suspect, politically motivated, and chauvinistic.
    In recent years, the work of archaeologists and historians of science concluded that there is no material evidence for any large scale migrations into India over the period of 4500 to 800 BC, implicitly supporting the traditional view of Indian history. The Left has responded by conceding that there were probably no invasions; rather, there were many small scale migrations by Aryans who, through a process of cultural dominance, imposed their language on north Indians.


    The drama of text-book revisions, both during the NDA and the current UPA governments, is essentially a struggle to impose one or the other of these viewpoints. In any other country, such a fight would have fought in the pages of academic journals; but in India, where the government decides what history is, it is a political matter.


    Now, in an important book titled The Real Eve: Modern Man's Journey out of Africa (New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers, 2003), the prominent Oxford University scholar Stephen Oppenheimer has synthesised the available genetic evidence together with climatology and archaeology with conclusions which have bearing on the debate about the early population of India. This work has received great attention in the West, and it will also interest Indians tremendously.


    Much of Oppenheimer's theory is based on recent advances in studies of mitochondrial DNA, inherited through the mother, and Y chromosomes, inherited by males from the father. Oppenheimer makes the case that whereas Africa is the cradle of all mankind; India is the cradle of all non-African peoples. Man left Africa approximately 90,000 years ago, heading east along the Indian Ocean, and established settlements in India. It was only during a break in glacial activity 50,000 years ago, when deserts turned into grasslands, that people left India and headed northwest into the Russian steppes and on into Eastern Europe, as well as northeast through China and over the now submerged Bering Strait into the Americas.


    In their migration to India, African people carried the mitochondrial DNA strain L3 and Y chromosome line M168 across south Red Sea across the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula. On the maternal side the mtDNA strain L3 split into two daughters which Oppenheimer labels Nasreen and Manju. While Manju was definitely born in India the birthplace of Nasreen is tentatively placed by him in southern Iran or Baluchistan. One Indian Manju subclan in India is as old as 73,000 years, whereas European man goes back to less than 50,000 years.
    Considering the paternal side, Oppenheimer sees M168 as having three sons, of whom Seth was the most important one. Seth, in turn, had five sons which are named by him as Jahangir, H, I, G and Krishna. Krishna, born in India, is the ancestor of the peoples of East Asia, Central Asia, Oceania and West Eurasia (through the M17 mutation). This is what Oppenheimer says about M17:

    South Asia is logically the ultimate origin of M17 and his ancestors; and sure enough we find highest rates and greatest diversity of the M17 line in Pakistan, India, and eastern Iran, and low rates in the Caucasus. M17 is not only more diverse in South Asia than in Central Asia but diversity characterizes its presence in isolated tribal groups in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a 'male Aryan Invasion of India.'

    Study of the geographical distribution and the diversity of genetic branches and stems again suggests that Ruslan, along with his son M17, arose early in South Asia, somewhere near India, and subsequently spread not only south-east to Australia but also north, directly to Central Asia, before splitting east and west into Europe and East Asia.



    Oppenheimer argues that the Eurocentric view of ancient history is also incorrect. For example, Europeans didn't invent art, because the Australian aborigines developed their own unique artistic culture in complete isolation. Indian rock art is also extremely ancient, going back to over 40,000 BC, so perhaps art as a part of culture had arisen in Africa itself. Similarly, agriculture didn't arise in the Fertile Crescent; Southeast Asia had already domesticated many plants by that time.


    Oppenheimer concludes with two extraordinary conclusions: 'First, that the Europeans' genetic homeland was originally in South Asia in the Pakistan/Gulf region over 50,000 years ago; and second, that the Europeans' ancestors followed at least two widely separated routes to arrive, ultimately, in the same cold but rich garden. The earliest of these routes was the Fertile Crescent. The second early route from South Asia to Europe may have been up the Indus into Kashmir and on to Central Asia, where perhaps more than 40,000 years ago hunters first started bringing down game as large as mammoths.'


    This synthesis of genetic evidence makes it possible to understand the divide between the north and the south Indian languages. It appears that the Dravidian languages are more ancient, and the Aryan languages evolved in India over thousands of years before migrations took them to central Asia and westward to Europe. The proto-Dravidian languages had also, through the ocean route, reached northeast Asia, explaining the connections between the Dravidian family and the Korean and the Japanese.


    Perhaps this new understanding will encourage Indian politicians to get away from the polemics of who the original inhabitants of India are, since that should not matter one way or the other in the governance of the country. Indian politics has long been plagued by the Aryan invasion narrative, which was created by English scholars of the 19th century; it is fitting that another Englishman, Stephen Oppenheimer, should announce its demise.


    (Link)

    Thursday, October 29, 2009

    More Aryan Invasion Rubbish

    I came across some typical crap coming from an American newspaper about the Aryan invasion through my RSS feed today(newsfeed, not the political party). A 1999 article was quoted to start off yet another pointless debate on the Aryan Invasion Theory on a forum. The signature of the person who started this topic says a lot about the mentality of people who buy into the Aryan Invasion Theory-  "Let's keep America beautiful by getting rid of niggers, spics, kikes, queers, and feminists!"


    Defenders of the theory conveniently forget that haplogroup R1a1, which is most often associated with the Aryan Invasion, is prevalent amongst tribes as well as lower castes of India in very high frequencies and not restricted to the upper castes by any means. The age,diversity, variance and frequency of R1a is highest in South Asia - with the age and variance amongst tribals being higher than in upper castes, almost proving that the origin of Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1 is RIGHT HERE IN INDIA. The direct correlation of haplogroup R1a1 and R2(high/low freq and variance in the same areas across the country) further suggests that they cohabited throughout, and coincidence can almost be ruled out (R2 is exceedingly rare, whereas R1a1 is present in high frequencies in Europe). Indian society evolved from tribal groups over millennia. I won't even get into the fact that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence of any kind of invasion at the time the so called white Aryans "took the women and set up the caste system in India". Since '99 however, the Aryan Invasion Theory has almost totally lost ground due to research in many fields, including genetics. The current trend is to manipulate and model studies on Indo-European languages to suit arrogant western beliefs that 'Proto-Indo-European', the supposed precursor of all IE languages, originated in Europe or Central Asia. South Asia is always totally sidelined in these western studies even though it is a known fact that Sanskrit is still the most advanced language on earth and is still used in India. Why the obsession with Central Asia being the homeland of mankind outside Africa and the Middle East? It's was and still is quite an inhospitable place whereas South Asia was and is a country rich in resources - perfect for human habitation.

    Aryan Invasion Theory supporters are alive and kicking till this day, flogging this dead horse regardless of countless studies disproving the theory. Many Indians themselves subscribe to AIT, maybe they love the idea of being partly European(it's common knowledge that most Indians look up to whites and white skin), however distant and  despite present day racist European supporters of this theory referring to ALL Indians as mongrels and half breeds who are literally 'bastards' - descendants of rape victims of the white invaders - not just North Indian 'Aryans'. All I can say is that I feel sorry for the low self esteem of these Indians. There are also many South Indians who love to support this theory because of their age old hatred of North Indians and possible inferiority complex due to their generally darker skin color(check out 'fair and lovely' sales in the south). The Brits also inferred that  since North Indian 'Aryans' are outsiders that stole the land and enslaved the local 'Dravidians' besides pushing them down south, they have every right to do the same. Also, after the discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization, the very same proponents of the Aryan Invasion Theory(AIT) had to change their story overnight from the Aryans being a noble and intelligent lot, to them being savages that destroyed the Indus Valley Civilization(IVC), LATER settling down and writing the Vedas and inventing Sanskrit. Oh yes, and of course they quickly added that the IVC was 'Dravidian' - thereby giving South Indians yet another reason to hate the North.


    It's time Indians woke up and realize that this is just a very outdated, racist and divisive idea instilled till this day in the minds of the gullible. In fact it is still being taught in schools all over India as fact, when it was always just a THEORY. AIT is a sham. Both South Indians, who believe they have been victimized by the North, and North Indians who believe they are superior due to alleged white European ancestry are losers at the end of the day. Neither of these things are true.  It's only the racist white man that will have the last laugh if Indians go on being deluded and continue being subservient to the west, buying hook line and sinker any horseshit that is fed to them.

    Thursday, October 8, 2009

    Y-DNA Haplogroup Frequency of Indian Muslims




    Indian Muslims average:
    • R2 - 10.2%
    • R1a1 - 32.25%
    • R1* - 2.08*
    • P* - 3.24%
    • O - 0.2%
    • L - 3%
    • K* - 2.78%
    • J2a - 8.58%
    • J2 - 6.72%
    • J(*xJ2) - 5.56%
    • H2 - 2.32%
    • H1a - 11.83%
    • H* - 1.39%
    • G - 3%
    • F* - 4.4%
    • E1b1b1a - 0.7%
    • C5 - 1.6%
    Dawoodi Bohra (Gujarat(West))
    R2 - 8/50
    R1a1 - 15/50
    P* - 4/50
    L - 3/50
    J2 - 4/50
    H1a - 8/50
    H* - 5/50
    F* - 2/50
    C5 - 1/50
    Dawoodi Bohra (South - TN)
    R1a1 - 14/26
    L - 2/26
    H2 - 2/26
    H1a - 8/26

    Iranian Shia (South)
    R2 - 4/25
    R1a1 - 1/25
    K* - 7/25
    J2 - 6/25
    H1a - 1/25
    G - 2/25
    F* - 4/25

    Mappla (South)
    R2 - 2/40
    R1a1 - 13/40
    L - 4/40
    K* - 2/40
    J2 - 4/40
    J*(xJ2) - 4/40
    H2 - 2/40
    H1a - 9/40

    Shia (North)
    R2 - 15/161
    R1a1 - 45/161
    R1* - 6/161
    P* - 8/161
    O - 1/161
    J2a - 22/161
    J2 - 7/161
    J*(xJ2) - 17/161
    H2 - 2/161
    H1a - 11/161
    H* - 1/161
    G - 8/161
    F* - 9/161
    E1b1b1a - 3/161
    C5 - 6/161

    Sunni (North)
    R2 - 15/129
    R1a1 - 51/129
    R1* - 3/129
    P* - 2/129
    L - 4/129
    K* - 3/129
    J2a - 15/129
    J2 - 8/129
    J*(xJ2) - 3/129
    H2 - 4/129
    H1a - 14/129
    G - 3/129
    F* - 4/129

    Total - 431

    Source: Traces of sub-Saharan and Middle Eastern lineages in Indian Muslim populations

    Indo Aryan and Slavic Linguistic and Genetic Affinities Predate the Origin Of Cereal Farming

    Joseph Skulj, Jagdish C. Sharda, Snejina Sonina,  Ratnakar Narale
    Paper read at: The Sixth International Topical Conference: Origin of Europeans
    Ljubljana, Slovenia June 6th and 7th 2008.

    Abstract:

    Linguistic comparisons between Indo-Aryan languages, Vedic Sanskrit in particular, and Slavic languages show evidence of remarkable similarities in words of elemental nature and those describing the process of domestication of animals specially the terminology regarding the sheep and the cattle. Similarly, Haplogroup (Hg) R1a1 (HG3 in Rosser’s nomenclature), the male lineage Y-Chromosome genetic marker found at high frequencies both in the Slavic and the Indo-Aryan male populations points to a common genetic origin of a large percentage of speakers of Slavic and Indic languages. Judging from the linguistic evidence, the separation of these Indo-European branches appears to predate the advent of cereal domestication. Applying Alinei’s ‘Lexical Self-Dating’ (LSD) methodology to date the linguistic and the genetic evidence, we estimate that the split between Indo-Aryans and the ancestors of Slavs occurred, afer the domestication of the sheep and cattle, about 10,000 years ago, but before cereal farming became a common industry amongst the ancestors of Slavs in Europe and Indo-Aryans on the Indian sub-continent. Moreover, the genetic evidence does not indicate that there were any major migrations of people from Europe, including the ancestors of the present day Slavs, to the Indian sub-continent during the last 8,000 years. The migration appears to have come from the Indian sub-continent to Europe. However, there is a record of many military incursions over the millennia into the sub-continent.

    Furthermore, based on the linguistic, genetic, zoo-archaeological and population growth evidence, the coalescence of R1a1 in an ancestor common to many Indo-Aryans and Slavs, probably occurred during the hunting-gathering era and there is evidence that the close contact between the ancestors of Indo-Aryans and Slavs continued during the sheep and cattle domestication, up to and including the nomadic pastoral age. Based on this evidence, the major population expansion from the Indian sub-continent into Europe appears to have come, before the age of cereal farming.

    Also the patrilineal Y-Chromosome genetic marker Hg R1a1, that accompanied this expansion, appears to be more than 100,000 years old, based on its relative high frequency, diversity and wide distribution extending from the Balkans to the Bay of Bengal. This estimated age, based on the reproductive rates of historical individuals, is considerably older than the molecular ages calculated on the basis of mutation rates as reported in literature.


    Conclusion:

    • In many instances, the Slovenian language appears to be grammatically closer to Sanskrit than other Slavic languages and even Indic languages such as Hindi, Bengali and Gujarati.
    • Genetic and linguistic afnities between the Indo-Aryan and Slavic speaking populations indicate that a large percentage of their ancestors had a common sojourn during the pre-pastoral and also during the pastoral age.Linguistic evidence suggests that the separation of the Indo-Aryans and the ancestors of present day Slavs occurred prior to the innovation of the cereal farming in agriculture.
    • Hg R1a1-M17 lineage appears to have come to Europe, via the ancestors of the present day Slavs, from the Indian sub-continent, before the spread of farming ~9000 years ago.
    • Genetic evidence does not support a large scale invasion of India from Europe during the prehistoric times, since no evidence of Hg R1*-M173, Hg I-M170 or of Hg N3-TAT has been found in India, although these Haplogroups are very frequent in Europe (Rosser et al. 2000, Sengupta et al. 2006).
    • The coalescence of Hg R1a1, the most frequent genetic marker in Indo-Aryan and Slavic populations, very likely occurred more than 100,000 years ago. Only if the most recent common ancestor of such a large percentage of Indo-Aryans and the Slavs lived more than 100,000 years ago, could the male population with this genetic marker grow to such high absolute numbers of 325 million men representing more than ~10 % of the world’s total male population.
    Link to full article

    Friday, September 25, 2009

    New paper on Indian Population History - "No Truth to the Aryan-Dravidian Theory"

    For the last couple of days many euro-centric bloggers assumed this study 'proves' that North Indians came from Europe via the alleged Aryan Invasion a few thousand years ago. Check out Dienekes blog for instance. Well, co-authors of the study say something else:

    Times of India
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/india/Aryan-Dravidian-divide-a-myth-Study/articleshow/5053274.cms
    HYDERABAD: The great Indian divide along north-south lines now stands blurred. A pathbreaking study by Harvard and indigenous researchers on

    ancestral Indian populations says there is a genetic relationship between all Indians and more importantly, the hitherto believed ``fact'' that Aryans and Dravidians signify the ancestry of north and south Indians might after all, be a myth.

    ``This paper rewrites history... there is no north-south divide,'' Lalji Singh, former director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) and a co-author of the study, said at a press conference here on Thursday.

    Senior CCMB scientist Kumarasamy Thangarajan said there was no truth to the Aryan-Dravidian theory as they came hundreds or thousands of years after the ancestral north and south Indians had settled in India.

    The study analysed 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups from 13 states. All the individuals were from six-language families and traditionally ``upper'' and ``lower'' castes and tribal groups. ``The genetics proves that castes grew directly out of tribe-like organizations during the formation of the Indian society,'' the study said. Thangarajan noted that it was impossible to distinguish between castes and tribes since their genetics proved they were not systematically different.

    The study was conducted by CCMB scientists in collaboration with researchers at Harvard Medical School,
    Harvard School of Public Health and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. It reveals that the present-day Indian population is a mix of ancient north and south bearing the genomic contributions from two distinct ancestral populations - the Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and the Ancestral South Indian (ASI).

    ``The initial settlement took place 65,000 years ago in the Andamans and in ancient south India around the same time, which led to population growth in this part,'' said Thangarajan. He added, ``At a later stage, 40,000 years ago, the ancient north Indians emerged which in turn led to rise in numbers here. But at some point of time, the ancient north and the ancient south mixed, giving birth to a different set of population. And that is the population which exists now and there is a genetic relationship between the population within India.''

    The study also helps understand why the incidence of genetic diseases among Indians is different from the rest of the world. Singh said that 70% of Indians were burdened with genetic disorders and the study could help answer why certain conditions restricted themselves to one population. For instance, breast cancer among Parsi women, motor neuron diseases among residents of Tirupati and Chittoor, or sickle cell anaemia among certain tribes in central India and the North-East can now be understood better, said researchers.

    The researchers, who are now keen on exploring whether Eurasians descended from ANI, find in their study that ANIs are related to western Eurasians, while the ASIs do not share any similarity with any other population across the world. However, researchers said there was no scientific proof of whether Indians went to Europe first or the other way round.

    Migratory route of Africans

    Between 135,000 and 75,000 years ago, the East-African droughts shrunk the water volume of the lake Malawi by at least 95%, causing migration out of Africa. Which route did they take? Researchers say their study of the tribes of Andaman and Nicobar islands using complete mitochondrial DNA sequences and its comparison those of world populations has led to the theory of a ``southern coastal route'' of migration from East Africa through India.

    This finding is against the prevailing view of a northern route of migration via Middle East, Europe, south-east Asia, Australia and then to India.


    I guess that as time goes by Aryan Invasion theorists will whittle down their 'theory' to "White Caucasian  Horse Riding  Proto-Indo-European Language Teacher That Digs Black Indian Aboroginal Chicks Changes The Indian Genetic Landscape Theory". :)

    Thursday, September 24, 2009

    New paper on Indian Population History

    Reconstructing Indian population history
    David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price & Lalji Singh

    "India has been underrepresented in genome-wide surveys of human variation. We analyse 25 diverse groups in India to provide strong evidence for two ancient populations, genetically divergent, that are ancestral to most Indians today. One, the 'Ancestral North Indians' (ANI), is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans, whereas the other, the 'Ancestral South Indians' (ASI), is as distinct from ANI and East Asians as they are from each other. By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations, we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 39–71% in most Indian groups, and is higher in traditionally upper caste and Indo-European speakers. Groups with only ASI ancestry may no longer exist in mainland India. However, the indigenous Andaman Islanders are unique in being ASI-related groups without ANI ancestry. Allele frequency differences between groups in India are larger than in Europe, reflecting strong founder effects whose signatures have been maintained for thousands of years owing to endogamy. We therefore predict that there will be an excess of recessive diseases in India, which should be possible to screen and map genetically."

    Editor's Summary


    24 September 2009

    Meet the ancestors: Indian population history from gene screening

    Analysis of genetic variation in 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups in India reveals that two ancient, genetically divergent populations are ancestral to most Indians today. One lineage, termed Ancestral North Indian, is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians and Europeans. The other, Ancestral South Indian, is not close to any group outside the subcontinent. The answers to several long-standing questions emerge from this work. It seems that 'caste' has been a powerful force shaping marriage in India for thousands of years — some anthropologists argued that its current strength was a product of British colonialism. And the enigmatic 'Negritos' of the Andaman Islands are identified as an ancient isolate from the Ancestral South Indian population. Allele frequency differences between population groups are high, in part due to the custom of within-group marriages, so it is likely that there is an excess of recessive diseases in India that can be screened for and mapped genetically.

     
     


    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/full/nature08365.html

    Saturday, September 12, 2009

    R2 Frequency Within 77 Indian Populations

    I extracted these figures from the link below. This was not a study of haplogroup frequency within specific communities but a general study of the distribution and frequency of haplogroups amongst high caste, low caste and tribal people of India(only some states). The results listed below are by no means indicative of R2 frequency within those communities because the sample sizes are very small in many instances. I just compiled this out of curiosity. For full information: A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios - Sahoo et al. , Supplemental Material

    Uttar Pradesh
    Tharu - 16.6%
    Khatri - 14%
    Kanyakubj Brahmin - 10%
    Bihar
    Yadav - 50%
    Baniya - 36%
    Kurmi - 15%
    Bhumihar - 10%
    Kayastha - 7%
    Bihar Brahmin - 5%
    West Bengal
    Karmali - 100%
    Mahishya - 23.5%
    Namasudra - 23%
    Maheli - 15.5%
    Orissa
    Khandayat - 46%
    Karan - 22%
    Gope - 18.75%
    Paroja - 15.3%
    Oriya Brahmin - 12.5%
    Himachal Pradesh
    HP Rajput - 13.3%
    Andhra Pradesh
    Kamma Chaudhary - 73.3% 
    Kappu Naidu - 72.2%
    Komati - 70%
    Reddy - 25%
    Chenchu - 20%
    Raju - 10.5%
    Lambadi - 5.5%
    Karnataka
    Lingayat - 30%
    Karnataka Muslim - 25%
    Karnataka Christian - 14%
    Kuruva - 10%
    Bhovi - 7%
    Tamil Nadu
    Kallar - 44%
    Gounder - 35%
    Vanniyar - 30%
    Chenchu - 20%
    Pallar - 13.3%
    Chakkliar - 11.1%
    Gujarat
    Gujarat Patel - 11%
    Maharashtra
    Dhangar - 25%
    Chitpavan Brahmin - 20%
    Madia Gond - 7%
    Desasth Brahmin - 6%
    Maratha - 6%
    Pawara - 6%


    0%

    Uttar Pradesh - Bhoksha, Kurmi, Thakur, Jaunsari. West Bengal - Bauri, Lodha, Kora.  Bihar - Rajput. Jharkhand - Bhumij, Birhor, Ho, Khari, Munda, Santhal, Oroan. Sikkim  - Nepali, Bhutia. Manipur - Muslim. Arunachal Pradesh - Adi Pasi. Mizoram - Hmar, Kuki, Lai, Lusei, Mara Orissa -Juang, Saora. Andhra Pradesh - Brahmin, Naikpod Gond, Yerukula. Karnataka - Gowda, Iyengar. Tamil Nadu -Irular. Maharashtra - Katkari, Mahadeo Koli.

    Friday, September 11, 2009

    Map of Aryan and Dravidian Languages in India

    Aryan(Indo-European) Languages

    Dravidian Languages

    Spatial frequency distribution map of Y-chromosome haplogroup R2 in South Asia.

    From:
    A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios.- Sahoo et al.


    Abstract:

    Understanding the genetic origins and demographic history of Indian populations is important both for questions concerning the early settlement of Eurasia and more recent events, including the appearance of Indo-Aryan languages and settled agriculture in the subcontinent. Although there is general agreement that Indian caste and tribal populations share a common late Pleistocene maternal ancestry in India, some studies of the Y-chromosome markers have suggested a recent, substantial incursion from Central or West Eurasia. To investigate the origin of paternal lineages of Indian populations, 936 Y chromosomes, representing 32 tribal and 45 caste groups from all four major linguistic groups of India, were analyzed for 38 single-nucleotide polymorphic markers. Phylogeography of the major Y-chromosomal haplogroups in India, genetic distance, and admixture analyses all indicate that the recent external contribution to Dravidian- and Hindi-speaking caste groups has been low. The sharing of some Y-chromosomal haplogroups between Indian and Central Asian populations is most parsimoniously explained by a deep, common ancestry between the two regions, with diffusion of some Indian-specific lineages northward. The Y-chromosomal data consistently suggest a largely South Asian origin for Indian caste communities and therefore argue against any major influx, from regions north and west of India, of people associated either with the development of agriculture or the spread of the Indo-Aryan language family. The dyadic Y-chromosome composition of Tibeto-Burman speakers of India, however, can be attributed to a recent demographic process, which appears to have absorbed and overlain populations who previously spoke Austro-Asiatic languages.


    Conclusion:

    It is not necessary, based on the current evidence, to look beyond South Asia for the origins of the paternal heritage of the majority of Indians at the time of the onset of settled agriculture. The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through the northwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny. Recent claims for a linkage of haplogroups J2, L, R1a, and R2 with a contemporaneous origin for the majority of the Indian castes' paternal lineages from outside the subcontinent are rejected, although our findings do support a local origin of haplogroups F* and H. Of the others, only J2 indicates an unambiguous recent external contribution, from West Asia rather than Central Asia. The current distributions of haplogroup frequencies are, with the exception of the O lineages, predominantly driven by geographical, rather than cultural determinants. Ironically, it is in the northeast of India, among the TB groups that there is clear-cut evidence for large-scale demic diffusion traceable by genes, culture, and language, but apparently not by agriculture.

     
      
      
     

    Saturday, September 5, 2009

    R2's Genetic Journey - from National Geographics Genographic Project


    Your Y-chromosome results identify you as a member of haplogroup R2.

    The genetic markers that define your ancestral history reach back roughly 60,000 years to the first common marker of all non-African men, M168, and follow your lineage to present day, ending with M124, the defining marker of haplogroup R2.

    If you look at the map highlighting your ancestors' route, you will see that members of haplogroup R2 carry the following Y-chromosome markers:

    M168 > M89 > M9 > M45 > M207 > M124

    What's a haplogroup, and why do geneticists concentrate on the Y chromosome in their search for markers? For that matter, what's a marker?

    Each of us carries DNA that is a combination of genes passed from both our mother and father, giving us traits that range from eye color and height to athleticism and disease susceptibility. One exception is the Y chromosome, which is passed directly from father to son, unchanged, from generation to generation.

    Unchanged, that is unless a mutation - a random, naturally occurring, usually harmless change occurs. The mutation, known as a marker, acts as a beacon; it can be mapped through generations because it will be passed down from the man in whom it occurred to his sons, their sons, and every male in his family for thousands of years.

    In some instances there may be more than one mutational event that defines a particular branch on the tree. This means that any of these markers can be used to determine your particular haplogroup, since every individual who has one of these markers also has the others.

    When geneticists identify such a marker, they try to figure out when it first occurred, and in which geographic region of the world. Each marker is essentially the beginning of a new lineage on the family tree of the human race. Tracking the lineages provides a picture of how small tribes of modern humans in Africa tens of thousands of years ago diversified and spread to populate the world.

    A haplogroup is defined by a series of markers that are shared by other men who carry the same random mutations. The markers trace the path your ancestors took as they moved out of Africa. It's difficult to know how many men worldwide belong to any particular haplogroup, or even how many haplogroups there are, because scientists simply don't have enough data yet.

    One of the goals of the five-year Genographic Project is to build a large enough database of anthropological genetic data to answer some of these questions. To achieve this, project team members are traveling to all corners of the world to collect more than 100,000 DNA samples from indigenous populations. In addition, we encourage you to contribute your anonymous results to the project database, helping our geneticists reveal more of the answers to our ancient past.

    Keep checking these pages; as more information is received, more may be learned about your own genetic history.

    Your Ancestral Journey: What We Know Now

    M168: Your Earliest Ancestor

     Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: Roughly 50,000 years ago

    Place of Origin: Africa

    Climate: Temporary retreat of Ice Age; Africa moves from drought to warmer temperatures and moister conditions

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 10,000

    Tools and Skills: Stone tools; earliest evidence of art and advanced conceptual skills

    Skeletal and archaeological evidence suggest that anatomically modern humans evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago, and began moving out of Africa to colonize the rest of the world around 60,000 years ago.

    The man who gave rise to the first genetic marker in your lineage probably lived in northeast Africa in the region of the Rift Valley, perhaps in present-day Ethiopia , Kenya, or Tanzania, some 31,000 to 79,000 years ago. Scientists put the most likely date for when he lived at around 50,000 years ago. His descendants became the only lineage to survive outside of Africa, making him the common ancestor of every non-African man living today.

    But why would man have first ventured out of the familiar African hunting grounds and into unexplored lands? It is likely that a fluctuation in climate may have provided the impetus for your ancestors' exodus out of Africa.

    The African ice age was characterized by drought rather than by cold. It was around 50,000 years ago that the ice sheets of northern Europe began to melt, introducing a period of warmer temperatures and moister climate in Africa. Parts of the inhospitable Sahara briefly became habitable. As the drought-ridden desert changed to a savanna, the animals hunted by your ancestors expanded their range and began moving through the newly emerging green corridor of grasslands. Your nomadic ancestors followed the good weather and the animals they hunted, although the exact route they followed remains to be determined.

    In addition to a favorable change in climate, around this same time there was a great leap forward in modern humans' intellectual capacity. Many scientists believe that the emergence of language gave us a huge advantage over other early human species. Improved tools and weapons, the ability to plan ahead and cooperate with one another, and an increased capacity to exploit resources in ways we hadn't been able to earlier, all allowed modern humans to rapidly migrate to new territories, exploit new resources, and replace other hominids.

    M89: Moving Through the Middle East

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 45,000 years ago

    Place: Northern Africa or the Middle East

    Climate: Middle East: Semiarid grass plains

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands

    Tools and Skills: Stone, ivory, wood tools

    The next male ancestor in your ancestral lineage is the man who gave rise to M89, a marker found in 90 to 95 percent of all non-Africans. This man was born around 45,000 years ago in northern Africa or the Middle East.

    The first people to leave Africa likely followed a coastal route that eventually ended in Australia. Your ancestors followed the expanding grasslands and plentiful game to the Middle East and beyond, and were part of the second great wave of migration out of Africa.

    Beginning about 40,000 years ago, the climate shifted once again and became colder and more arid. Drought hit Africa and the grasslands reverted to desert, and for the next 20,000 years, the Saharan Gateway was effectively closed. With the desert impassable, your ancestors had two options: remain in the Middle East, or move on. Retreat back to the home continent was not an option.

    While many of the descendants of M89 remained in the Middle East, others continued to follow the great herds of buffalo, antelope, woolly mammoths, and other game through what is now modern-day Iran to the vast steppes of Central Asia.

    These semiarid grass-covered plains formed an ancient "superhighway" stretching from eastern France to Korea. Your ancestors, having migrated north out of Africa into the Middle East, then traveled both east and west along this Central Asian superhighway. A smaller group continued moving north from the Middle East to Anatolia and the Balkans, trading familiar grasslands for forests and high country.

    M9: The Eurasian Clan Spreads Wide and Far

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 40,000 years ago

    Place: Iran or southern Central Asia

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic

    Your next ancestor, a man born around 40,000 years ago in Iran or southern Central Asia, gave rise to a genetic marker known as M9, which marked a new lineage diverging from the M89 Middle Eastern Clan. His descendants, of which you are one, spent the next 30,000 years populating much of the planet.

    This large lineage, known as the Eurasian Clan, dispersed gradually over thousands of years. Seasoned hunters followed the herds ever eastward, along the vast super highway of Eurasian steppe. Eventually their path was blocked by the massive mountain ranges of south Central Asia - the Hindu Kush, the Tian Shan, and the Himalayas.

    The three mountain ranges meet in a region known as the "Pamir Knot," located in present-day Tajikistan. Here the tribes of hunters split into two groups. Some moved north into Central Asia, others moved south into what is now Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent.

    These different migration routes through the Pamir Knot region gave rise to separate lineages.
    Most people native to the Northern Hemisphere trace their roots to the Eurasian Clan. Nearly all North Americans and East Asians are descended from the man described above, as are most Europeans and many Indians.

    M45: The Journey Through Central Asia

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 35,000

    Place of Origin: Central Asia

    Climate: Glaciers expanding over much of Europe

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 100,000

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic (link)

    The next marker of your genetic heritage, M45, arose around 35,000 years ago, in a man born in Central Asia. He was part of the M9 Eurasian Clan that had moved to the north of the mountainous Hindu Kush and onto the game-rich steppes of present-day Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and southern Siberia.

    Although big game was plentiful, the environment on the Eurasian steppes became increasing hostile as the glaciers of the Ice Age began to expand once again. The reduction in rainfall may have induced desertlike conditions on the southern steppes, forcing your ancestors to follow the herds of game north.

    To exist in such harsh conditions, they learned to build portable animal-skin shelters and to create weaponry and hunting techniques that would prove successful against the much larger animals they encountered in the colder climates. They compensated for the lack of stone they traditionally used to make weapons by developing smaller points and blades- microliths that could be mounted to bone or wood handles and used effectively. Their tool kit also included bone needles for sewing animal-skin clothing that would both keep them warm and allow them the range of movement needed to hunt the reindeer and mammoth that kept them fed.

    Your ancestors' resourcefulness and ability to adapt was critical to survival during the last ice age in Siberia, a region where no other hominid species is known to have lived.

    The M45 Central Asian Clan gave rise to many more; the man who was its source is the common ancestor of most Europeans and nearly all Native American men.

    M207: Leaving Central Asia

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 30,000

    Place of Origin: Central Asia

    Climate: Glaciers expanding over much of Europe and western Eurasia

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 100,000

    Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic

    After spending considerable time in Central Asia, refining skills to survive in harsh new conditions and exploit new resources, a group from the Central Asian Clan began to head west towards the European subcontinent.

    An individual in this clan carried the new M207 mutation on his Y chromosome. His descendants ultimately split into two distinct groups, with one continuing onto the European subcontinent, making this man the ancestor of most Western European men alive today.

    But your genetic lineage does not descend from this westward migrating band of hunter-gatherers. The second group did not head west into Europe, but rather likely turned south, ultimately ending their journey in the Indian subcontinent and giving rise to many men whose lineages survive there today. This distribution adds weight to linguistic and archaeological evidence suggesting that a large migration from the Asian steppes into India occurred within the last 10,000 years.

    M124: Southward to the Indus Valley

    Fast Facts

    Time of Emergence: 25,000

    Place of Origin: Southern Central Asia

    Climate: Ice Age

    Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Hundreds of Thousands

    Tools and Skills: Middle Upper Paleolithic

    About 25,000 years ago one of your ancestors, who lived in southern Central Asia, first displayed the genetic marker M124. Today M124 defines your haplogroup R2.

    The descendants of the first man to carry M124 migrated southward in a forked pattern. They inhabited what is now Pakistan and also, further east, modern India. Today members of haplogroup R2 are found in Northern India, Pakistan and southern Central Asia at frequencies of five to ten percent. Individuals belonging to your R2 lineage made their way as part of the second major wave of human migration into India long after a large wave of African migrants traveled along the Indian coastline some 50,000 to 60,000 years ago.

    In addition, members of this distinctive lineage are also found in Eastern Europe among the Gypsy populations of that region. The story told in their genes ties these wandering peoples back to their ancient origins on the Indian subcontinent.

    However, the ancient Indian migrations and the distribution of genetic lineages that they ultimately gave rise to remain mysterious. This is because we have precious little data with which to uncover the history of this haplogroup.