Sunday, October 25, 2009

Updated list of R2 frequency

http://sites.google.com/site/r2dnainfo/R2-Home/r2-dna/r2-frequency/r2-frequencies-worldwide
at 8:48 PM
Labels: , , , , , , ,

2 comments:

  1. KishkindhaaOctober 27, 2009 at 3:30 AM

    Boss,

    I am looking at the amount of haplo I in Portugal. There is no way way some pidky viking invasions can account for it. It is becoming quite clear that IJ is the native paleo group of "western eurasia" (actually mideast); with R being a very recent input from the East, quite probably post-glacial. This becomes quite clear, even when going by relative age alone: IJ is a derivative of F, while R is a derivative of the much downstream NOP which is exclusively S/SE Asian. Date of colonization of Europe is 45K with Western europe at only 33K. Indian colonization is at 85K. The picture is quite clear: Europe is the Western version of Beringia!!

    H and K (found deep within asia) are the Indian homologues of IJ, and upstream C is found exclusively in Asia. IJ was probably derived directly from basal F loitering around Hindu Kush. At any rate, colonization of mideast/eurostan is much later than interior Asia. Euro Neanderthal proved a much more fierce opponent than Asiatic Erectus.

    Expect some more garbage autosomal studies which will predictably get fawned over by Dieno and his cartoon gallery. These studies demonstrate only one thing and that is the lack of M in europe. But they conveniently forget that all their other lines are derived from R (dubbed Rohani by Oppenheimer) which is undoubtedly Indian. Probably they will pull some stunt that all euro males had been waiting for indian females to arrive in the wintery culdesac for 40K years, the difference in the respective dates of colonization.

    Enjoy the tamasha.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RJOctober 27, 2009 at 11:52 AM

    White racists want to have us believe that they lived in Europe(Anatolia and beyond) all along, post Africa. For them Africa is too far removed, so they aren't really bothered about that issue - they probably write the negros off as one step down the human evolutionary ladder or something of the sort. They conveniently ignore the ice age in Europe, and that the climate and abundant resources of South Asia would have been the ideal place for humans to flourish. It is more than obvious that atleast haplogroup R originated in South Asia and there was a migration westward towards the end of the last ice age. The ramifications of accepting a late migration from the east are huge - world history(mostly western propaganda)will have to be rewritten, so I don't see them changing their attitude any time soon.

    It is a well known fact that Europeans take credit for anything of any value on this earth - they falsely claim to have invented and 'discovered' everything under the sun. To add even more to their list of achievements and statistics sometimes even non-Europeans are included. Nowadays if an Indian with American citizenship does something great the media will hail him as a great American, but if the same person commits a crime he will be called a man of South Asian origin(the same applies to all other non-Europeans). Have you ever heard of any report in the media referring to a white American as a person of European origin? Also, if a crime is committed by a white man - he will be mentioned just by name and not by race in the media(only cops will refer to skin colour just to make it easier to identify the person). My point by mentioning these things is that racism is rampant in this day and age and it is very much alive and kicking in current genetic studies as well. It is just more subtle in most cases. Despite overwhelming proof of the earliest civilizations being Eastern, Europeans promote the idea that everything came from them. Notice how many of them are dropping the idea of an Aryan invasion and are now messing around with linguistics since AIT is falling apart at the seams. Unfortunately their ideas are being propagated in schools the world over till this day - their flawed racist shit is so deeply ingrained in peoples minds that anyone who questions these ideas becomes a pariah.

    Sadly, India today isn't what it used to be in the distant past. There were undeniably many reasons for this downfall - the Brits, the Muslim invasions and all those other things. Europeans will invariably just point a finger at the country in its present situation and mock anyone that has anything good to say about the country or challenges them. There is an intellectual blockade against Indian scientists and scholars that counter euro-centric ideas - they are ridiculed and portrayed as Hindutva fanatics. All research has to get a stamp of approval from a white guy before it goes mainstream. It really sucks. It would be amazing if Indians forget their petty differences and selfishness and stand up against the gora eurostanis.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)